NOTE: These program notes are published here for patrons of the the Madison Symphony Orchestra and other interested readers. Any other use is forbidden without specific permission from the author. |
Click here to
download a "printable" (large-print) version of these
notes.
Madison
Symphony Orchestra Program Notes
January
20-21-22, 2023
J.
Michael Allsen
We open this
concert with our first-ever performance of Schubert’s Symphony No. 3, a spirited work written
while he was still a
teenager. Another Madison Symphony Orchestra first is Bartók’s Suite from “The Miraculous Mandarin.” This colorful, but
challenging score tells
a dark and disturbing story. After intermission we welcome
back pianist Yefim
Bronfman for Rachmaninoff’s virtuouso showpiece, the Piano Concerto No. 3. This is his fourth
appearance with the MSO.
He previously played here in 2003 (Beethoven, Piano Concerto No. 3), 2008 (Prokofiev, Piano Concerto No. 3), and 2014 (Beethoven Piano Concertos No. 2 and No. 5).
This
work, written when Schubert was 18, is a fine example of his
all-too-rarely heard early symphonies.
Franz
Schubert
Born: January 31,
1797, Vienna, Austria.
Died: November
19, 1828, Vienna, Austria.
Symphony No. 3 in D Major, D.
200
Background
Schubert himself likely played
the viola part in an informal
premiere of this symphony at the home of one of his many
Viennese friends.
The early symphonies of
Franz Schubert are infrequently
played today—and that is a shame. These are bright and
vivacious works, written
with a song-composer’s gift for unforgettable melodies and
an increasingly
confident grasp on orchestral writing. Growing up in Vienna,
Schubert was of
course surrounded by the symphonies of Haydn and Mozart, and
was certainly well
aware of the more radical symphonies produced at the time by
Beethoven. He also
studied privately with the court composer Antonio Salieri.
Not surprisingly,
his Symphony No. 1
(1813; written
while he was a student at the City College in Vienna) and Symphony No. 2 (early 1815), are rather
conservative in style, following
the forms of Haydn and Mozart. He began work on the Symphony No. 3 on May 24, 1815, but set it
aside after completing
only the beginning of the first movement. He returned to the
symphony on July
11, completing it in just eight days. At this time, the
18-year-old composer
was working as a teacher at his father’s school but 1815 was
a tremendously
prolific year. In addition to the symphonies Nos. 2-3, Schubert completed four small operas,
two
masses, and some 145
songs! He does not seem
to have had a
particular purpose in mind for Symphony
No. 3, and in fact, like all of his symphonies, it was
not published until
long after his death. However, it was probably played by an
amateur orchestra
that had had its beginnings as a Schubert family quartet, in
which Franz played
viola. By late 1815, the group had grown into a small
orchestra that met
regularly at the home of violinist Otto Hatwig.
What You’ll Hear
This symphony is laid out in four
movements:
• A movement in sonata
form with a formal
introduction.
• A calm Allegretto
with a contrasting middle section.
• A vigorous minuet,
combined with a rustic
German country dance.
• A brilliantly quick
finale in Italian comic
opera style.
Schubert uses a small
“Classical” orchestra for this compact
symphony: strings, pairs of woodwinds, horns and trumpets,
and timpani. The
influence of Haydn and Mozart is clearly there, but there is
also a hint of
Rossini, whose comic operas had become phenomenally
successful popular in
Vienna at the time. It opens with a long Haydnesque
introduction (Adagio
maestoso) that spends much of its
time in D minor. But the character and tempo change abruptly
for the body of
the movement (Allegro
con brio), and
the clarinet introduces a good-humored main theme in D
Major. This continues
into a brisk transition that uses a sweeping figure from the
introduction. The
second theme, played by the oboe, is equally jolly. A short
but intense
development focuses on a figure from the first theme. In the
recapitulation,
Schubert, introduces a few surprises: expanding and
developing the transition,
and having the clarinet play both main themes. The
transitional figure appears
again at the end, now transformed into a forceful coda.
In place of the usual slow
movement, Schubert provides a relaxed
Allegretto. (In
this case, his model
may have been Beethoven’s seventh and eighth symphonies,
which had been played
in Vienna a few years earlier.) This is set in scherzo form,
beginning with a
gentle tune in two repeated sections. In the middle, there
is a more pastoral
episode, led by solo clarinet, and the movement ends with a
repeat of the
opening music. Schubert follows Viennese tradition with a Menuetto as the third movement—but this, like
many of Haydn’s
minuets, this rather rough-edged and fast (vivace)
music, with its oddly-placed accents, has little to do with
the old courtly
dance The central trio section, led by the oboe and bassoon,
and accompanied in
German country dance band style, is a Ländler, a German
dance tremendously
popular in the decades before it was eclipsed by the waltz
in the 1820s.
The brilliant and quick
finale (Presto vivace), with a feather-light main
theme in 6/8, often
sounds very much like music that could have been
transplanted from a Rossini
overture. Schubert introduces flashes of humor: offbeat
accents to punctuate
the main theme, a mock-serious second theme, and a couple of
grandiose pauses
that momentarily halt the furious forward momentum.
Though it was
unsuccessful as a ballet during his lifetime,
Bartók’s The
Miraculous Mandarin
became much more popular—and much less controversial—as a
concert piece
Béla
Bartók
Born: March
25,
1881, Nagyszentmiklós, Hungary.
Died: September 26,
1945,
New York City.
Suite from “The Miraculous Mandarin,”
Op.
19
Background
In both The Miraculous
Mandarin and his opera Bluebeard’s
Castle (1918) Bartók follows an Expressionist style.
This approach, most
prominently heard in his contemporaries Schoenberg, Berg,
and Weber, is often
intensely dissonant and disjointed, expressing dark and
often traumatic
subjects.
Bartók composed his ballet The Miraculous Mandarin in 1918-19, on a 1917
play by Menyhért
Lenglel. (Lenglel described it as a “pantomime grotesque.”)
In the years after
World War I, Hungary was in political turmoil, and under the
control of an
authoritarian right-wing regime. With no prospect of
performing as potentially
controversial a work as The Miraculous
Mandarin, Bartók did not return to the score for five
years, and finally
secured a premiere at the Cologne Opera in November 1926.
This performance was
a disaster. The conductor, Eugen Szenkar, later remembered: “At the end of the
performance there was a
concert of whistling and catcalls. The uproar was so
deafening and lengthy that
the fire curtain had to be brought down. Nevertheless, we
endured it and weren’t
afraid to appear in front of the curtain, at which point
the whistles resumed
with a vengeance.” There was
no
second performance in Cologne, and the work was actually
banned in Germany.
Though there was a more successful production in Prague a
year later, through
the rest of Bartók’s life, The
Miraculous Mandarin was known almost exclusively
through a suite, or
“concert version” he extracted from the score in 1927. (The
full score was not
published until 1955.) There was to have been a performance
in Budapest in
March 1931, in a much-revised version. The production was
troubled from the
start: sloppy performances by a disgruntled cast, and poor
stage design caused
Bartók himself to cancel the performance.
So why was this work so
problematic? Bartók’s music is
certainly difficult: dissonant, intensely rhythmic, and
presenting tremendous
technical challenges for nearly every section of the
orchestra. But it was the plot
of The Miraculous
Mandarin that seems
to have caused the problems: a dark and depressing
Expressionist story with
multiple seductions, violence, murder, and the supernatural.
What You’ll Hear
Bartók’s brilliantly-orchestrated
music closely follows the lurid
and violent plot of The
Miraculous
Mandarin
The suite is drawn directly
from the first two-thirds of the
original score and the music reflects the action on stage.
There are six
sections played without pauses. It opens with a pair of
scenes titled Introduction
(Street Sounds) — The Thugs
Order the Girl to the Window. It begins with a musical
picture of a busy
and ugly modern city: Bartók described it as an “awful
clamor, clatter,
stampeding. and blowing of horns.” The main setting is a
room occupied by three
thugs and a girl. The men force her to go to the window, to
seduce passing men
into the room so that they might rob them. Here the thugs
are represented by
angry trombone passages as the noise of the city continues
in the background.
In The Girl Seduces
the Old Rake, she
entices their first victim. The girl, in the guise by a
sinuous clarinet,
attracts a rakish old man up to the room. The horny old guy
is represented by
smearing trombones, and when it is clear that he does not
have any money, the
thugs beat him and throw him out: a swirling string passage
with violent
percussion accents. The next victim is a shy young man. In The Girl Seduces the Young Man, the clarinet
again plays a slinky
melody and when the young man comes up to the room, they
dance together in a
series of passages for solo woodwinds. But once again he
turns out to be
penniless and is tossed out by the criminals in another
violent percussive
passage.
The Girl Seduces the
Mandarin begins with another clarinet passage, as the
girl spots their
third victim, an elderly mandarin. (While it was an
honorific in China, here
“mandarin” was actually a rather ugly racist stereotype
widely current at the
time: a wealthy Chinese man who lusts after white women.)
The mandarin is
played by the trombones and horns, with a pentatonic,
“oriental”-sounding
melody. In The Girl
Slowly Begins to
Dance for the Mandarin, she continues her seduction as
the mandarin enters
the room, with slow, teasing music that eventually grows
into a kind of dreamy
waltz. The Dance
Concludes: the Mandarin
Chases the Girl begins with a frantic passage for
muted trombones
representing the aroused mandarin, and then wild music as he
chases the girl
around the room. At the end of this section, Bartók provided
a brief concert
ending to bring the suite to a close.
What did Bartók leave out?
The closing sections of the piece
are the most violent, bizarre, and overtly sexual bits of The Miraculous Mandarin, and probably the most
objectionable to the
original audience. The thugs suddenly emerge from hiding,
and beat the mandarin,
stealing his jewels and money. They make three attempts to
murder him, first
smothering him with a bedsheet, then stabbing him with a
rusty knife, and
finally hanging him from the chandelier. The mandarin not
only refuses to die,
but begins to glow, still looking at the girl. Finally, she
realizes what has
to be done. He is cut down from the chandelier and after she
returns his
embrace, he finally dies. Pretty strong stuff for 1926...or
2023 for that
matter.
Rachmaninoff
was one of the 20th century’s greatest
pianist-composers. Maestro DeMain has described his third
piano concerto as the
“Mt. Everest” of the piano repertoire: a challenging work
for both the soloist
and the orchestra.
Sergei
Rachmaninoff
Born: April 1, 1873, Oneg, Russia.
Died: March 28, 1943, Hollywood, California.
Concerto No. 3 for Piano and
Orchestra in D minor, Op. 30
Background
Rachmaninoff composed this work
for his first tour of the United
States, premiering it at his debut concert in New York City
in November 1909.
In 1909, Rachmaninoff spent
the summer at the Russian
country estate of his wife’s family preparing for his
upcoming American tour,
practicing and working on a third piano concerto to be
unveiled at his American
debut in New York. Rachmaninoff, the last in a long line of
Romantic
pianist/composers, was then at the peak of his powers, and
was acclaimed throughout
the world. A trip to America was a solid career move for any
Old World virtuoso
of that time. If American audiences were notoriously
conservative, tours in
this country were also notoriously profitable. He looked
forward to his first
trip to America with anticipation and some nervousness. His
ocean passage to
New York anything but relaxing: the ever-driven Rachmaninoff
spent virtually
the entire trip in his stateroom, practicing on a silent
keyboard. (Igor
Stravinsky, remembering Rachmaninoff’s unrelenting
seriousness, once described
him as a “six-and-a-half-foot-tall scowl.”) Though the
premiere of his new
concerto under Walter Damrosch in November was a great
success, the composer
remembered the second New York performance, conducted by
Gustav Mahler, with
special fondness. Mahler went to great lengths to perfect
the complex
orchestral accompaniment during a marathon rehearsal. One
account of this event
notes that, after the rehearsal had gone and hour and a half
past its scheduled
ending time, Rachmaninoff and Mahler paused to discuss a
troublesome passage.
When a few brass players at the back of the room began to
pack up, Mahler fixed
them with a steely glare and growled: “As long as I am
sitting, no musician has
a right to get up.” (There were no Union rules those
days...)
What You’ll Hear
The concerto is laid out in three
broad movements:
• An opening movement
that develops two lyrical
themes, culminating in a huge cadenza.
• The Intermezzo
is a very free set of variations on a theme introduced by
the orchestra.
• Like the opening,
the virtuosic final is set
in sonata form, this time developing much more forceful
ideas.
The D minor piano concerto
has firm place in the concert
repertoire as a virtuoso masterwork, and it is among the
most difficult of
Rachmaninoff’s piano works, making sizable demands on
soloist and orchestra
alike. The concerto’s appeal goes beyond piano pyrotechnics,
however—the
sumptuous themes of its three movements are subtly
interrelated, imposing a
kind of organic unity on this work. In the first movement (Allegro ma non tanto) the piano enters after
only two measures of
introduction, with a subdued stepwise melody. Rachmaninoff
denied that this
melody was a Russian folk tune or Orthodox chant, asserting
that it simply
“wrote itself.” The strings introduce a more poetic second
theme, which is
taken up in an elaborate piano rhapsody. The movement closes
with a monumental
solo cadenza, which is occasionally supported by thematic
fragments from the
woodwinds. At the last moment, there is a brief reminiscence
of the opening
theme.
The opening of the Intermezzo
(Adagio) is one of
relatively few
places in the concerto where the orchestra takes the lead,
introducing a lush
and lyrical melody. After this opening passage, however, the
piano is fully in
charge, spinning a free set of variations on this opening
theme. The variations
gather momentum towards the end, with the soloist playing
ever-more complex and chromatic figuration above occasional
snippets
of melody from the opening movement. After a restatement of
the main theme, a
suddenly aggressive piano passage and a few crisp brass
chords lead directly
into the Finale (Alla breve). The lengthy last movement is a
fiery display of piano
technique. Both of its forceful themes are introduced by the
soloist and
elaborated upon almost solely on the piano, during a
prolonged variation-style
development section. An extended coda brings the concerto to
an exalted
conclusion in D Major.
________
program notes ©2022 by J.
Michael Allsen